Delayed gratification for a greater reward is something we all learn as children. In fact, my parents used to explicitly teach it with chocolates and other rewards. The concept of delaying reward or gratification for a better outcome is one that has been taught as a virtue for many years and we all know the benefits of it.
In our financial lives the benefits are obvious - if you save more before you buy a house, the burden of loan repayments for a similar property will be much less...or you can buy a bigger house. You can extend this type of analogy to almost any financial transaction.
But can we take delayed gratification too far?
If we are particularly good at delayed gratification we are probably better savers than we are spenders. I recently wrote a post on the difference and how to tell which one you are. This is not necessarily a problem but I think it can be taken too far.
With financial matters delayed gratification can be taken too far because the payoff from tomorrow will almost always be greater than the payoff today. Does this mean that we continue to delay our gratification until we are old or unable to really enjoy the fruits of our labour?
I am particularly good at delayed gratification - if I can see a bigger payoff (especially financially) from not spending money today then it will go under lock and key. However this means that I often set a financial goal (spending wise) that I am then delay further. An of this was my purchase of a sports car. I went back and had a read through my posts and I first mentioned my sports car in my 2012 financial goals...almost exactly 2 years ago. For one reason or another I have continued to delay this purchase.
I have been thinking about my 2014 financial goals and once again looked at putting off my purchase of a sports car. This time I was thinking of
In our financial lives the benefits are obvious - if you save more before you buy a house, the burden of loan repayments for a similar property will be much less...or you can buy a bigger house. You can extend this type of analogy to almost any financial transaction.
But can we take delayed gratification too far?
If we are particularly good at delayed gratification we are probably better savers than we are spenders. I recently wrote a post on the difference and how to tell which one you are. This is not necessarily a problem but I think it can be taken too far.
With financial matters delayed gratification can be taken too far because the payoff from tomorrow will almost always be greater than the payoff today. Does this mean that we continue to delay our gratification until we are old or unable to really enjoy the fruits of our labour?
I am particularly good at delayed gratification - if I can see a bigger payoff (especially financially) from not spending money today then it will go under lock and key. However this means that I often set a financial goal (spending wise) that I am then delay further. An of this was my purchase of a sports car. I went back and had a read through my posts and I first mentioned my sports car in my 2012 financial goals...almost exactly 2 years ago. For one reason or another I have continued to delay this purchase.
I have been thinking about my 2014 financial goals and once again looked at putting off my purchase of a sports car. This time I was thinking of