This book has lessons for everyone but is especially
interesting for investors and those interested in finance generally. Among the broad variety of topics covered
some of the most interesting are:
·
Forecasts are inherently flawed (especially over
the long term) – how can you tell what is going to happen in 20 years time when
you have no idea what innovations are going to take place in that time? (i.e.
an example that the book uses is that in the early 1990s US government
departments were using long term oil prices of $27 a barrel as a forecast
assumption). Also note the impaction the
above has for temperature prices in the context of global warming (or climate
change as it is now called)
·
Statistical inference from past events is also
flawed as it does not consider the effects of the high impact unknown
event. To illustrate this Taleb uses the
example of a turkey that is fattened up every day for its whole life – the
turkey will assume that based on the last 1000 days of its experience it should
be fed into the future (and we all know what happens around thanksgiving). I found this particularly interesting especially
when you view this idea in light of what happened to Long Term Capital
Management (see my review of When Genius Failed here)
·
Modern finance is steeped in the idea of the
bell curve which is based on a set of quite restrictive assumptions and
historical experience – six sigma events are relatively common in finance
markets (more than should statistically be the case anyway) and investors
should not the probability of these at all times
·
So much of life (and financial success) is largely
a matter of chance, however if you put yourself in chances way (i.e. those
areas which have limited downside but are in the right spot to benefit from a
positive black swan) then you are more able to take advantage of the black swan
Given the amount I obviously enjoyed the ideas in this book
you may be wondering why I gave it such a (relatively) poor rating. The reason is simply that this book needs to
win some sort award for rambling and straying off topic. I got bored and frustrated at this book
putting it down at least 10 times before I could be bothered going back to it
again. The book feels like no one read
it over before they hit print.
What is also slightly frustrating (though remarkably common
for academic writers) is that he is presenting his thesis as fact. For example he presents the interesting idea
that no one could have predicted the start of the Second World War and that we
as students of history conveniently fit together the pieces of the puzzle with
the benefit of hindsight. Taleb uses
bond prices and the tendency of spreads to widen and the fact that this didn’t
happen as evidence supporting this theory.
Don’t get me wrong – it is a very interesting theory however Taleb leads us to believe that
anyone who doesn’t support this point of view has their heads in the sand, are
arrogant or at worst stupid. Taleb is
remarkably condescending of those who have alternative points of view while he
presents himself, and others who believe the same things that he does as the
only examples of those who understand the way the world works. While a reader will probably find this
slightly annoying while reading through the book it doesn’t take away from the
value of the message.
Aside from these glaring flaws (and the fact that you will
probably get bored at some point reading this book) I think The Black Swan has
real value to most readers. It probably
isn’t a book I’d sit down and read again however the ideas are going to stay
with me for a very long time.
Pros
·
Opens the readers eyes to the unknown and the
large impacts these can have in our lives
·
Allows the reader to evaluate the information
they have about the world in a different framework. Especially good for evaluating what the
reader thinks is going to happen in the future
·
Ably demonstrates the flaws of modern finance
and statistical reasoning especially around forecasting and predicting the
future
Cons
·
Rambling and boring – this book has the best
ideas presented in the worst possibly way
·
As indicated above the author is supremely
confident in his own ideas and as a result intellectually snobbish and arrogant
·
While the book doesn’t assume a great deal of
prior knowledge before reading the book it certainly helps with understanding
what the author is talking about as he doesn’t simply step through ideas and
concepts so everyone can understand it
Overall
·
While there are significant flaws in the way
this book is written (I think I’ve mentioned rambling several times by now) I
would still recommend it to everyone – the concepts presented in this book are
not limited only to investing and finance however investors would do well to
keep these in mind when putting their hard earned money to work
·
I recommend reading this book slowly over a
couple of weeks (perhaps a chapter at a time).
I found it helped to think about the concepts in this book with
reference to those things I take for granted and also those things I believed
blindly from the ‘experts’
No comments:
Post a Comment